Difference between revisions of "Quality Management"
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
=='''Quality Attributes'''== | =='''Quality Attributes'''== | ||
| − | Quality attributes, also known as quality factors, quality characteristics, or [[Non-Functional Requirements (glossary)|non-functional requirements]] are a set of system functional and non-functional requirements that are used to evaluate the system performance. There are a large number of system quality attributes identified in the literature (e.g. MSDN 2010, Barbacci et al. 1995). Depending on the type of the system being considered, some of these attributes are more prominent than others. Ideally, a system would be optimized for all the quality attributes that are important to the stakeholders, but this is an impossible task. Therefore, it is important to conduct a trade off analysis to identify the relationship between the attributes, and whether a change in one attributes would affect positively or negatively any other attribute. An example of such trade off is shown in Table 1 below. (See SEBoK discussion on [[Systems Engineering and | + | Quality attributes, also known as quality factors, quality characteristics, or [[Non-Functional Requirements (glossary)|non-functional requirements]] are a set of system functional and non-functional requirements that are used to evaluate the system performance. There are a large number of system quality attributes identified in the literature (e.g. MSDN 2010, Barbacci et al. 1995). Depending on the type of the system being considered, some of these attributes are more prominent than others. Ideally, a system would be optimized for all the quality attributes that are important to the stakeholders, but this is an impossible task. Therefore, it is important to conduct a trade off analysis to identify the relationship between the attributes, and whether a change in one attributes would affect positively or negatively any other attribute. An example of such trade off is shown in Table 1 below. (See SEBoK discussion on [[Systems Engineering and Specialty Engineering|specialty engineering]] for additional information on quality attributes.) |
<center> | <center> | ||
| Line 104: | Line 104: | ||
*'''Environment:''' both environmental setting and physical setting that best simulate the operational environment and/or the best setting to get the most accurate measurements | *'''Environment:''' both environmental setting and physical setting that best simulate the operational environment and/or the best setting to get the most accurate measurements | ||
| − | Once the quality attributes are identified and prioritized, then the MSA | + | Once the quality attributes are identified and prioritized, then the MSA supports the monitor and control of overall system quality. |
Additional details about measurement are presented in the [[Measurement|measurement]] article. | Additional details about measurement are presented in the [[Measurement|measurement]] article. | ||
Revision as of 17:44, 31 August 2012
Whether a systems engineer delivers a product, a service, or an enterprise, the deliverable should meet the needs of the customer and be fit for use. Such a deliverable is said to be of high quality. The process to assure high quality is called quality management.
Overview
Over the past 80 years, a quality movement has emerged to enable organizations to produce high quality deliverables. This movement has gone though four stages:
- Acceptance sampling was developed to apply statistical tests to decide whether or not to accept a lot of material based on a random sample of its content.
- Statistical process control was developed to determine if production processes were stable. Instead of necessarily measuring products, processes were measured. Processes that departed from a state of statistical control were far more likely to develop low quality deliverables.
- Design for quality focused on designing processes that were robust against causes of variation, reducing the likelihood that a process would go out of control, and accordingly reducing the monitoring requirements.
- Six sigma methods applied the tools and power of statistical thinking to improve other aspects of the organization.
Definitions
The American Society for Quality provides the following definitions:
- acceptance sampling involves the inspection of a sample to decide whether to accept the entire lot. There are two types of sampling:
- In attributes sampling, the presence or absence of a characteristic is noted in each of the units inspected.
- In variables sampling, the numerical magnitude of a characteristic is measured and recorded for each inspected unit; this involves reference to a continuous scale of some kind.
- Statistical Process Control (SPC) is the application of statistical techniques to control a process; often used interchangeably with the term “statistical quality control.”
- quality is a subjective term for which each person or sector has its own definition. In technical usage, quality can have two meanings:
- The characteristics of a product or service that bear on its ability to satisfy stated or implied needs.
- A product or service free of deficiencies. According to Joseph Juran, quality means “fitness for use.” According to Philip Crosby, it means "conformance to requirements."
- six sigma is a method that provides organizations tools to improve the capability of their business processes. This increase in performance and decrease in process variation lead to defect reduction and improvement in profits, employee morale, and quality of products or services. Six Sigma quality is a term generally used to indicate a process is well controlled (±6 s from the centerline in a control chart).
Quality Attributes
Quality attributes, also known as quality factors, quality characteristics, or non-functional requirements are a set of system functional and non-functional requirements that are used to evaluate the system performance. There are a large number of system quality attributes identified in the literature (e.g. MSDN 2010, Barbacci et al. 1995). Depending on the type of the system being considered, some of these attributes are more prominent than others. Ideally, a system would be optimized for all the quality attributes that are important to the stakeholders, but this is an impossible task. Therefore, it is important to conduct a trade off analysis to identify the relationship between the attributes, and whether a change in one attributes would affect positively or negatively any other attribute. An example of such trade off is shown in Table 1 below. (See SEBoK discussion on specialty engineering for additional information on quality attributes.)
| Flexibility | Maintainability | Reliability | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Flexibility | + | - | |
| Maintainability | + | + | |
| Reliability | - | + |
Finding the right set of quality attributes is the first step in quality control and management. In order to achieve high quality, quality has to be measured, monitored, managed, and improved on. Therefore, in order to increase the overall system quality, it is necessary to
- identify and prioritize the quality attributes;
- identify the metrics that can be used for these attributes;
- measure and monitor the attributes;
- validate the measurements;
- analyze the result of those measurements; and
- establish processes and procedures that result in improved system quality, based on the analysis.
Quality Attributes for Products
Quality attributes for products focus on the conformance to the specifications for the product; frequently these are manufacturing specifications. Examples include physical characteristics (length, weight, finish, capacity, etc.) being inside a given tolerance range. The physical characteristics can be related to the function of the product or to aesthetic qualities.
A single product may have a vector of quality attributes of high dimension, and an associated region in which the vector is expected to be. Often the quality is summarized by saying the item is "in compliance" (if the vector is in the acceptable region) or "defective" (if the vector is outside the acceptable region).
Quality Attributes for Services
Quality of services plays a major role in the customer satisfaction, which is the measurement of the overall system quality. Services can be divided into two major categories: primary and secondary. For example, the city public transportation system, the United States postal service, or the medical services provided by a hospital are all examples of primary services. Services that provide help to a customer are secondary services, which are typically referred to as "customer service". Identifying the appropriate quality attributes is critical in the quality management of services. Some examples of service quality attributes include: affordability, availability, dependability, efficiency, predictability, reliability, responsiveness, safety, security, usability, etc. Again, depending on the type of the service, some of these attributes are more prominent than the others.
For example, in the case of services that are provided by the hospital, one may be more interested in the availability, reliability, and responsiveness than potentially the security (typically hospitals are assumed to be safe) and the affordability (typically insurance covers the majority of the cost). Of course, if the patient does not have a good insurance coverage, then the importance of affordability will increase (de Knoning, 2006).
Quality Attributes for Enterprises
An enterprise typically refers to a large complex set of interconnected entities that includes people, technologies, processes, financial, and physical elements. It is obvious that a typical enterprise has a number of internal and external stakeholders, and as a result there are a large number of quality attributes that will define its quality. Identifying the right set of attributes is typically more challenging in such a complex system. An example of an enterprise is the air traffic management system that is mainly responsible for the safe and efficient operation of the civil aviation within a country or collection of countries. There are a large number of stakeholders that are concerned about the overall quality of the system, some example of these stakeholders and some of the primary quality attributes that they are concerned with are identified in Table 2.
| Stakeholders | Primary Quality Attributes |
|---|---|
| Passengers | safety, affordability, and reliability |
| Airlines | adaptability, efficiency, and profitability |
| Air traffic controller | safety, reliability, and usability |
| Hardware & software developers | reliability, fault tolerance, and maintainability |
| Government/regulatory agency | safety, reliability, affordability, etc. |
Measuring Quality Attributes
Quality cannot be achieved if it cannot be measured. The Measurement System Analysis (MSA) (Wheeler and Lynday 1989) is a set of measuring instruments that provide an adequate capability for a team to conduct appropriate measurements in order to monitor and control quality. The MSA is a collection of
- Tools: measuring instruments, calibration, etc.
- Processes: testing and measuring methods, set of specifications, etc.
- Procedures: policies and procedures and methodologies that are defined by the company and/or regulatory agency.
- People: personnel (managers, testers, analysis, etc.) who are involved in the measurement activities.
- Environment: both environmental setting and physical setting that best simulate the operational environment and/or the best setting to get the most accurate measurements
Once the quality attributes are identified and prioritized, then the MSA supports the monitor and control of overall system quality.
Additional details about measurement are presented in the measurement article.
Quality Management Strategies
Acceptance Sampling
In acceptance sampling many examples of a product are presented for delivery. The consumer samples from the lot and each member of the sample is then either categorized as "acceptable" or "unacceptable" based on some attribute (attribute sampling) or measured against one or more metrics (variable sampling). Based on the measurements, an inference is made as to whether the lot meets the customer requirements.
There are four possible outcomes of the sampling of a lot.
| Lot meets requirement | Lot fails requirement | |
|---|---|---|
| Sample passes test | No error | Consumer risk |
| Sample fails test | Producer risk | No error |
A sample acceptance plan balances the risk of error between the producer and consumer. Detailed ANSI/ISO/ASQ standards describe how this allocation is performed (ANSI/ISO/ASQ A3534-2-1993: Statistics—Vocabulary and Symbols—Statistical Quality Control).
Statistical Process Control
Statistical process control (SPC) is a method that was invented by Walter A. Shewhart (1931), which adopts statistical thinking to monitor and control the behaviors and performances of a process. It means using statistical analysis techniques as tools in appropriate ways to estimate the variation in the performance of a process, to investigate the causes of this variation, and to recognize from the data when the process is not performing as it should (Mary et al. 2006, 441). By performance here, what is meant is ‘how well the process is done.’
The theory of quality management emphasizes managing processes by fact and maintaining systematic improvement. All product developments are a series of interconnected processes that have variation in their results. Understanding variation with SPC technology can help the process executors understand the facts of their processes and find the improvement opportunities from a systematic view.
The key tools in SPC are control charts. The control chart is also called the Shewhart 3-sigma chart. It consists of 3 limit lines; the center line, which is the mean of statistical samples, the upper and lower control limit lines, which are calculated by mean and standard deviation of statistical samples. The observed data points or their statistic value (mean as process behaves) are drawn in the chart with time or other sequence orders. Upper and lower control limits indicate the threshold at which the process output will be considered as ‘unlikely.’
There are two sources of process variation. One is common cause variation, which is due to inherent interaction among process components. Another is assignable cause, which is due to events that are not part of the normal process. SPC stresses bringing a process into a state of statistical control, where only common cause variation exists, and keeping it in control. A control chart is used to distinguish between variation in a process resulting from common causes and assignable causes.
If the process is in control, and if standard assumptions are met, more than 99.73% points will plot within the control limit. Any points outside the limits, or that appear in some systematic patterns, imply a new source of variation would be introduced. A new variation means increased quality cost.
The control limits of control are based on understanding the history of the process. It is also called the natural bound of the process. It presents a graphic display of process stability or instability over time, controls the current process, and predicts the future of the process.
More advanced control charts exist. Cumulative Sum Charts detect small, persistent step change model departures. Moving average charts, with different possible weighting schemes, also detect persistent changes (Hawkins and Olwell 1996).
Design for Quality
Variation in the inputs to a process usually results in variation in the outputs. Processes can be designed, however, to be robust against variation in the inputs.
Response surface experimental design and analysis is the statistical technique used to assist in determining the sensitivity of the process to variations in the input. Such an approach was pioneered by Taguchi.
Six Sigma
Six sigma methodology (Pyzdek and Keller, 2009) is a set of tools to improve the quality of business processes; in particular, to improve performance and reduce variation.
Six sigma methods were pioneered by Motorola and came into wide acceptance after they were championed by General Electric.
Problems are addressed by six sigma projects. These projects follow a five stage process:
- Define the problem, the stakeholders, and the goals
- Measure key aspects and collect relevant data
- Analyze the data to determine cause-effect relationships
- Improve the current process / Design a new process
- Control the future state / Verify the design
These steps are known as DMAIC for existing processes and DMADV for new processes.
An extensive body of literature exists on six sigma.
A variant of six sigma is called lean six sigma wherein the emphasis is on improving or maintaining quality while driving out waste.
Standards
Primary standards for quality management are maintained by ISO, principally the IS0 9000 series. The ISO standards provide requirements for the quality management systems of a wide range of enterprises, without specifying how the standards are to be met, and have world-wide acceptance. The key requirement is that the system must be audited.
In the United States, the Malcolm Baldridge National Quality Award presents up to three awards in six categories: manufacturing, service company, small business, education, health care, and nonprofit. The Baldridge Criteria have become de facto standards for assessing the quality performance of organizations.
References
Works Cited
Barbacci, M., M.H. Klein, T.A. Longstaff, and C.B. Weinstock. 1995. Quality Attributes. Pittsburg, PA, USA: Software Engineering Institute/Carnegie Melon University. CMU/SEI-95-TR-021.
Chrissis, M.B., M. Konrad, and S. Shrum. 2006. CMMI Guidelines for Process Integration and Product Improvement,. 2nd ed. Boston, MA, USA: Addison Wesley. (ISBN 0321279670).
Evans, J. & W. Lindsay. 2010. Managing for Quality and Performance Excellence. Florence, KY, USA: Cengage Southwestern. (ISBN 0324783205)
Juran, J.M. 1992. Juran on Quality by Design: The New Steps for Planning Quality into Goods and Services. New York, NY, USA: The Free Press. (ISBN 0029166837)
Koning, H. de, et al. 2006. "Lean Six Sigma in Healthcare." Journal for Healthcare Quality 28 (2) pp 4-11.
MSDN. 2010. "Chapter 16: Quality Attributes," in Microsoft Application Architecture Guide, 2nd Edition. Microsoft Software Developer Network, Microsoft Corporation. Accessed August 31, 2012. Available online at http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff650706.
Moen, R.D., T.W. Nolan, and L.P. Provost. 1991. Improving Quality through Planned Experimentation. New York, NY, USA: McGraw-Hill. (ISBN 0-07-042673-2)
Pyzdek, T. and P.A. Keller. 2009. The Six Sigma Handbook. 3rd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. (ISBN 0071623388)
Shewhart, W.A. 1931. Economic Control of Manufactured Product. New York, NY, USA: Van Nostrand.
Wheeler, D.J. and R.W. Lyday. 1989. Evaluating the Measurement Process, 2nd ed. Knoxville, TN, USA: SPC Press. (ISBN 9780945320067 ISBN 094532006X)
Primary References
Chrissis, M.B., M. Konrad, and S. Shrum. 2006. CMMI Guidelines for Process Integration and Product Improvement. 2nd ed. Boston, MA, USA: Addison Wesley. (ISBN 0321279670).
Evans, J. & W. Lindsay. 2010. Managing for Quality and Performance Excellence. Florence, KY, USA: Cengage Southwestern. (ISBN 0324783205)
Juran, J.M. 1992. Juran on Quality by Design: The New Steps for Planning Quality into Goods and Services. New York, NY, USA: The Free Press. (ISBN 0029166837)
Moen, R.D., T.W. Nolan, and L.P. Provost. 1991. Improving Quality through Planned Experimentation. New York, NY, USA: McGraw-Hill. (ISBN 0-07-042673-2)
Pyzdek, T. and P.A. Keller. 2009. The Six Sigma Handbook. 3rd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. (ISBN 0071623388)
Wheeler, D.J. and R.W. Lyday. 1989. Evaluating the Measurement Process. 2nd ed. Knoxville, TN, USA: SPC Press. (ISBN 9780945320067 ISBN 094532006X)
Additional References
Hawkins, D. and D.H. Olwell. 1996. Cumulative Sum Charts and Charting for Quality Improvement. New York, NY, USA: Springer.
Shewhart, W.A. 1931. Economic Control of Manufactured Product. New York, NY, USA: Van Nostrand.
SEBoK Discussion
Please provide your comments and feedback on the SEBoK below. You will need to log in to DISQUS using an existing account (e.g. Yahoo, Google, Facebook, Twitter, etc.) or create a DISQUS account. Simply type your comment in the text field below and DISQUS will guide you through the login or registration steps. Feedback will be archived and used for future updates to the SEBoK. If you provided a comment that is no longer listed, that comment has been adjudicated. You can view adjudication for comments submitted prior to SEBoK v. 1.0 at SEBoK Review and Adjudication. Later comments are addressed and changes are summarized in the Letter from the Editor and Acknowledgements and Release History.
If you would like to provide edits on this article, recommend new content, or make comments on the SEBoK as a whole, please see the SEBoK Sandbox.
blog comments powered by Disqus