Difference between revisions of "SEBoK Users and Uses"

From SEBoK
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
==Primary Users==
 
==Primary Users==
Primary users are those who use the SEBoK directly, as shown in Table 1. Hyperlinks in the second column link to the associated use case, where one has been written. The use cases are listed at the end of the topic, and may also be seen [http://www.sebokwiki.org/1.1.1/index.php/Category:Use_Case here.]  
+
Primary users are those who use the SEBoK directly, as shown in Table 1. Hyperlinks in the second column link to the associated use case, where one has been written. The use cases are listed at the end of the topic, and may also be seen [http://www.sebokwiki.org/1.1.1/index.php?title=Category:Use_Case here.]  
  
 
{|
 
{|

Revision as of 15:45, 14 June 2013

The users and uses described in this article were identified based on the six SEBoK purposes described in the SEBoK v. 1.1.1 Introduction.

Users can either be primary (those who use the SEBoK directly) or secondary (those who use the SEBoK with assistance from a systems engineer). Indicative, but not exhaustive, sets of example uses are shown in Tables 1 and 2 below.

Primary Users

Primary users are those who use the SEBoK directly, as shown in Table 1. Hyperlinks in the second column link to the associated use case, where one has been written. The use cases are listed at the end of the topic, and may also be seen here.

Table 1. Primary SEBoK Users and Common Uses. (SEBoK Original)
# Users Uses
1 Practicing Systems Engineers ranging from novice through expert
  • Taking on a new SE role in a project; preparing by finding references for study
  • Expanding SE expertise and specialization; preparing by finding references for study
  • Seeking to understand the principles of SE; seeking the best references to elaborate on those principles
  • Reviewing a project or mentoring a new SE performer; seeking to understand what best practices to look for
  • Pursuing professional development through study of SE topics, including new developments in SE
2 Process engineers responsible for defining or implementing SE processes
  • Maintaining a library of SE process assets; seeking to understand which SE process models and standards are most relevant
  • Tailoring a process for a specific project; seeking to learn how others have tailored processes, or how a specific application domain affects tailoring
  • Measuring the effectiveness of an organization’s SE processes; seeking to learn how others have done that
  • Defining standards for a professional society or standards organization
3 Faculty Members
  • Developing a new graduate program in SE, and deciding what core knowledge all its students must master; the user should consult the Graduate Reference Curriculum for Systems Engineering (GRCSE™) in conjunction with the SEBoK
  • Developing a new SE course; seeking to identify course objectives, topics, and reading assignments
  • Incorporate SE concepts in courses or curricula focused on engineering disciplines other than SE
4 GRCSE authors
5 Certifiers
  • Defining a company’s in-house SE certification program; seeking to understand what others have done, how such programs are typically structured, and how to select the knowledge that each person seeking certification should master
  • Defining certification criteria for a professional society or licensure program
6 General Managers, Other Engineers, developers, testers, researchers
  • Mastering basic vocabulary, boundaries, and structure of SE; seeking a few primary references
  • Learning what the scope of SE is, relative to the General Manager role
  • Learning what the the role of the systems engineer consists of, relative to others on a project or in an organization
  • Learning to effectively perform a general manager role on an SE integrated product team
7 Customers of Systems Engineering
  • Providing resources to and receiving artifacts from systems engineers
  • Seeking to better understand what to ask for, how to request it, how much to pay for it, and how to judge the quality of what is received
8 SE managers
  • Evaluating possible changes in team processes and tools proposed by systems engineers on various teams; seeking independent information with which to evaluate the proposals
  • Hiring systems engineers, and developing competency-based job descriptions
9 SE researchers
  • Looking for gaps are in SE knowledge to help guide a research agenda
  • Getting familiarize with a research topic; seeking the most important articles about the topic

Secondary Users

Secondary users are those who use the SEBoK with assistance from a systems engineer, as shown in Table 2.

Table 2. Secondary SEBoK Users and Common Usages. (SEBoK Original)
# Users Uses
1 Human resource development professionals
  • Supporting the hiring and professional development of systems engineers
2 Non-technical managers
  • Augmenting understanding of central concerns with information about relevant SE topics; e.g., a contracting manager might want to better understand SE deliverables being called out in a contract
3 Attorneys, policy makers
  • Defining the impact of SE performance on central concerns; e.g., understanding the liability of a systems engineer for errors in judgment on a project, or the limitations of SE in guaranteeing the success of a project against actions of sponsors, managers, or developers

List of Use Cases

At the time of version 1.0.1, not every class of user has a use case developed. To illustrate the major uses, the following use cases are included:

While not exhaustive, the use cases show the utility of the SEBoK in various applications and contexts.

References

None.


< Previous Article | Parent Article | Next Article >


SEBoK v. 1.9.1 released 30 September 2018

SEBoK Discussion

Please provide your comments and feedback on the SEBoK below. You will need to log in to DISQUS using an existing account (e.g. Yahoo, Google, Facebook, Twitter, etc.) or create a DISQUS account. Simply type your comment in the text field below and DISQUS will guide you through the login or registration steps. Feedback will be archived and used for future updates to the SEBoK. If you provided a comment that is no longer listed, that comment has been adjudicated. You can view adjudication for comments submitted prior to SEBoK v. 1.0 at SEBoK Review and Adjudication. Later comments are addressed and changes are summarized in the Letter from the Editor and Acknowledgements and Release History.

If you would like to provide edits on this article, recommend new content, or make comments on the SEBoK as a whole, please see the SEBoK Sandbox.

blog comments powered by Disqus