Difference between revisions of "Talk:SEBoK Users and Uses"

From SEBoK
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Replaced content with "{{Review Instructions}}")
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Tom Hilburn
+
{{Review Instructions}}
 
 
1. Table 1 - For certifiers, no mention of preparers of profession-wide certification programs (e.g., ICSE and IEEE).
 
 
 
2. Table 1 - How about those preparing SE Standards?
 
 
 
Garry Roedler:
 
Agree with Tom on the two changes for Table 1.
 
For the second addition, I would expand it to include those preparing standards and other industry-wide SE direction or guidance.
 
 
 
Olwell: added in core edit.
 

Latest revision as of 23:53, 6 November 2011

Review Instructions

Please note that in order to provide review comments, you must first log in to the wiki. Please go to Login or create an account if you do not have a username (less than 1 minute).


Please provide your feedback on this article by responding to the specific discussion points below. In order to respond, please click “Reply” under the appropriate discussion thread. Feel free to read the comments of other reviewers as well (you may also respond directly to these comments). Please note that each article has a place for “Open Discussion” – please place any comments not related to the specific discussion points into this thread.

As the BKCASE author team develops SEBoK 0.75, they will provide an adjudication comment for each ‘‘thread’’ in the discussion – not each individual comment.

Note: We value community feedback and assume that all reviewers will respond in a professional manner. However, if any reviewer uses any form of profanity or consistently posts inflammatory comments or spam messages, that reviewer’s IP address will be blocked. To report any such problems, please email bkcase@stevens.edu.