Difference between revisions of "Talk:System Definition"

From SEBoK
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Replaced content with "{{Review Instructions}}")
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Garry Roedler:
+
{{Review Instructions}}
 
 
Figure 4 is obsolete.  Many of the SEBoK KA and Topic names have changed since this figure was drawn.  For example, "Transfer for Use" is now called "System Deployment", "Operation" is now "Operation of the System", "System Maintenance and Logistic Support" is now two topics "System Maintenance" and "Logistics", "System Update / Upgrade" is now "Capability Updates, Upgrades, and Modernization", and "System Disposal" is now "Disposal and Retirement".  Maintenance also includes a new topic called "Service Life Extension"
 
 
 
The discussion of iteration, recursion, and SoI applies to all of Part 3 and would be better moved to the Part 3 Introduction, which already covers these topics to some extent.  Keeping it here is redundant.  Instead, this article could mention that the concepts of Iteration and Recursion are important and point to the Part 3 Introduction.  Likewise, for SoI. 
 
 
 
Too many of the sections in the article read as a tutorial without specific citations or references provided.  These should be summarized further with pointers to the literature.
 
 
 
The first 3 paragraphs of the section about the importance of an ontology applies to all of Part 3 and would be better moved to the Part 3 Introduction.
 
 
 
The Approaches supported by the ontology is a bit redundant with the previously discussed Top-down and Bottom-up approaches.  These should be combined and reduced. 
 
 
 
Primary references should have links to the reference articles.
 

Latest revision as of 00:32, 7 November 2011

Review Instructions

Please note that in order to provide review comments, you must first log in to the wiki. Please go to Login or create an account if you do not have a username (less than 1 minute).


Please provide your feedback on this article by responding to the specific discussion points below. In order to respond, please click “Reply” under the appropriate discussion thread. Feel free to read the comments of other reviewers as well (you may also respond directly to these comments). Please note that each article has a place for “Open Discussion” – please place any comments not related to the specific discussion points into this thread.

As the BKCASE author team develops SEBoK 0.75, they will provide an adjudication comment for each ‘‘thread’’ in the discussion – not each individual comment.

Note: We value community feedback and assume that all reviewers will respond in a professional manner. However, if any reviewer uses any form of profanity or consistently posts inflammatory comments or spam messages, that reviewer’s IP address will be blocked. To report any such problems, please email bkcase@stevens.edu.