|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | == Coherence with Part 2 ==
| |
| − | Hillary S:
| |
| | | | |
| − | This section looks as if it is going in the right direction, though it could benefit with a slightly more coherent structure and a more holistic principled overview - the current writing style feels very process-centric rather than purpose-driven.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | There is a section on "systems analysis" in Section 2, which at the moment is completely incoherent with this (part 3) article! Co-ordination is required.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Olwell: this is a fairly narrow view of systems analysis. Broader views include capability analysis, mission analysis, development of CONOPS, analysis of T&E data, and modeling and simulation activities applied throughout the entire SE process. There are very few citations in the body of the article; many more are needed for V1.0.
| |