Difference between revisions of "Service Life Extension"

From SEBoK
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 196: Line 196:
  
 
[[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|[Go to discussion page]]]
 
[[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|[Go to discussion page]]]
<center>[[Product and Service Life Management|<- Previous Article]] | [[Systems Engineering and Management|Parent Article]] | [[Capability Updates, Upgrades, and Modernization|Next Article ->]]
+
<center>[[Product and Service Life Management|<- Previous Article]] | [[Systems Engineering and Management|Parent Article]] | [[Capability Updates, Upgrades, and Modernization|Next Article ->]]</center>
 +
==Signatures==
 
[[Category: Part 3]][[Category:Topic]]
 
[[Category: Part 3]][[Category:Topic]]

Revision as of 21:41, 9 August 2011

Product and service life extension involves continued usage of a product and service after the system has reached its original design life (glossary). Product and service life extension involves assessing the life cycle cost (LCC) (glossary) of continuing the use of the product or service versus the cost of a replacement system.

service life extension (sle) emphasizes reliability upgrades and component replacement, or rebuilding of the system, to delay the system’s entry into wear-out status due to prohibitively expensive sustainment or reliability and performance requirements that can no longer be met. The goal is typically to return the system to as near new condition as possible, consistent with the economic constraints of the program.

SLE is regarded as an environmentally friendly way to relieve rampant waste by prolonging the use-life of retiring products and preventing them from being discarded too early with their unexplored value. However, challenged by fast-changing technology and physical deterioration, a major concern in planning a product SLE is how fit a product might be to serve an extra life.


Topic Overview

Key factors and questions that must be considered by the systems engineer during service life extension include:

  • Current life cycle costs of the system,
  • Design life and expected remaining useful life of the system,
  • Software maintenance
  • Configuration Management
  • Warranty policy,
  • Availability of parts, subsystems, and manufacturing sources
  • Availability of system documentation to support life extension

System design life is a major consideration for service life extension. System design life parameters are established early on during the system design phase and include key assumptions involving safety limits and material life. Safety limits and the properties of material aging are critical to defining system life extension. Jackson (2007, 91-108) emphasizes that architecting for system resiliency increases system life. Jackson points out that a system can be architected to withstand internal and external disruptions. Systems that age through use, such as aircraft, bridges, and nuclear power plants, require periodic inspection to ascertain the degree of aging and fatigue. he results of inspections determine the need for actions to extend the product life (Elliot, Chen, and Swanekamp 1998, section 6.5).

Software maintenance is a critical aspect of service life extension. The legacy system may include multiple computer resources that have been in operation for a period of many years, with functions that are essential and must not be disrupted during the upgrade or integration process. Typically, legacy systems include a computer resource or application software program which continues to be used because the cost of replacing or redesigning is prohibitive. The Software Engineering Institute (SEI) has addressed the need for service life extension of software products and services and provide useful guidance in the on-line library for Software Product Lines (SEI 2010, 1).

Systems engineers have found that service life can be extended through the proper selection of materials, for example those that have special coatings. Transportation system elements such as highway bridges and rail systems are being designed for extended service life by using special epoxy-coated steel (Brown, Weyers, Spinkel. 2006, 13).

Diminishing manufacturing sources and diminishing suppliers need to be addressed early in the service life extension process. Livingston (2010) in Diminishing Manufacturing Sources and Material Shortages (DMSMS) Management Practices provides a method for addressing product life extension when the sources of supply are an issue. He addresses the product life cycle model and describes a variety of methods that can be applied during system design to minimize the impact of future component obsolescence issues.

During product and service life extension, it is often necessary to revisit & challenge the assumptions behind any previous lifecycle cost analysis (and constituent analyses) to evaluate their continued validity / applicability early in the service life extension process.

Application to Product Systems

Product life extension requires an analysis of the life cycle cost associated with continued use of the existing product versus the cost of a replacement product. The INCOSE Systems Engineering Handbook v.3.2.1, Chapter 3.3 Life-Cycle stages points out the support stage includes service life extension. Chapter 7 Life cycle cost (LCC) model provides a framework to determine if a product’s life should be extended. Blanchard & Fabrycky’s 5th edition of Systems Engineering and Analysis, chapter 17, provides a Life Cycle Cost methodology and emphasis the analysis of different alternatives before making a decision on product life extension.

For military systems, service life extension is considered a subset of modification or modernization. Military systems use well developed detailed guidance for service life extensions (Service Life Extension Programs – SLEP). Office of the under Secretary of Defense AT&L provides an on-line reference (Defense Acquisition University, https://www.dau.mil )for policies, procedures, planning guidance and whitepapers for military product serviced life extension. Continuous military system modernization is a process by which state-of-the-art technologies are inserted continuously into weapon systems to increase reliability, lower sustainment costs, and increase the war fighting capability of a system to meet evolving customer requirements throughout an indefinite service life.

Aircraft service life can be extended by reducing dynamic loads which lead to structural fatigue. The Boeing B-52 military aircraft and the Boeing 737 commercial aircraft are prime examples of system life extension. The B-52 aircraft was first fielded in 1955 and continues to be operated in 2011. The Boeing 737 passenger aircraft has been fielded since 1967 and continues operation today.

For nuclear reactors, system safety is the most important precondition for the service life extension. The system safety must be maintained while extending the service life (Paks, 2010). Built-in test, automated fault reporting and prognostics, analysis of failure modes, and the detection of early signs of wear and aging may be applied to predict the time when maintenance actions will be required to extend the service life of the product.

Application to Service Systems

For systems that provide services to a larger consumer base, service life extension involves continued delivery of the service to end consumers without any disruption. Service life extension involves capital investment and financial planning. Service life extension involves phased deployment of changes. Examples of this are transportation systems, water treatment facilities, energy generation and delivery systems, and the health care industry.

As new technologies are introduced, service delivery can be improved while reducing life cycle costs. Service systems have to continuously assess delivery costs based upon the use of newer technologies.

Water handling systems provide a good example of a service system that undergoes life extension. Water handling systems have been in existence since early civilization. Since water handling systems are in use as long as a site is occupied (e.g. the Roman aqueducts), and upgrades are required as population expands, such systems are a good example of "systems that live forever." For example, there are still US water systems that use a few wooden pipes, since there has been no reason to replace them. Water system life extension must deal with the issue of water quality and capacity for future users (Mays, 2000). Water quality requirements can be further understood from the (AWWA, 2010).

Application to Enterprises

Service life extension of a large enterprise such as NASA’s national space transportation system involves service life extension on the elements of the enterprise such as the space vehicle (Shuttle), ground processing systems for launch operations and mission control, and space-based communication systems that support space vehicle tracking and status monitoring. Service life extension of an enterprise requires a holistic look across the entire enterprise. A balanced approach is required to address the cost of operating older system components versus the cost required to implement service life improvements.

Large enterprise system such as oil and natural gas reservoirs which span large geographical areas can use advance technology to increase service life. The economic extraction of natural resources from previously established reservoirs can extend the system life of oil and natural gas reservoirs. Life extension methods include pumping special liquids or gases into the reservoir to push the remaining oil or natural gas to the surface for extraction (Office of Natural Gas & Oil Technology).

Other Topics

Commercial product developers have been required to retain information for extended periods of time after the last operational product or unit leaves active service (for up to twenty years). Regulatory requirements should be considered when extending service life (INCOSE 2011).

Practical Considerations

The cost associated with life extension is one of the main inputs into the decision to extend service life of a product or a service. Often is the case that the funding required for service life extension of large complex systems span several fiscal planning cycles and is therefore subject to changes in attitude by the elected officials the appropriate the funding.


References

Please make sure all references are listed alphabetically and are formatted according to the Chicago Manual of Style (15th ed). See the BKCASE Reference Guidance for additional information.

Citations

AWWA. AWWA manuals of water supply practices. in American Water Works Association (AWWA) [database online]. Denver, CO, USA, 2010 Available from http://www.awwa.org/Resources/standards.cfm?ItemNumber=47829&navItemNumber=47834 (accessed August 5, 2010).

Blanchard and Fabrycky. 2006. Systems Engineering and Analysis, 4th edition. Prentice Hall International Series.

Brown, M., R. Weyers, and M. Sprinkel. 2006. Service life extension of virginia bridge decks afforded by epoxy-coated reinforcement. Journal of ASTM International (JAI) 3 (2) (February 2005): 13.

DAU. Acquisition community connection (ACC): Where the DoD AT&L workforce meets to share knowledge. in Defense Acquisition University (DAU)/US Department of Defense (DoD) [database online]. Ft. Belvoir, VA, USA, 2010 Available from https://acc.dau.mil/ (accessed August 5, 2010).

Elliot, T., K. Chen, and R. C. Swanekamp. 1998. Standard handbook of powerplant engineering. New York, NY: McGraw Hill, section 6.5.

INCOSE Systems Engineering Handbook v3.2.1. A Guide for System Life Cycle Processes and Activities. 2011. San Diego, CA, USA: International Council on Systems Engineering (INCOSE), INCOSE-TP-2003-002-03.2.1

Jackson. 2007. A Multidisciplinary Framework for Resilience to Disasters and Disruptions. Journal of Integrated Design and Process Science Volume 11 (2), IOS Press

Livingston, H. 2010. GEB1: Diminishing manufacturing sources and material shortages (DMSMS) management practices. McClellan, CA, USA: Defense MicroElectronics Activity (DMEA)/U.S. Department of Defense (DoD).

Mays, L., ed. 2000. Water distribution systems handbook. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Book Company: Chapter 3.

Office of Natural Gas and Oil Technology. 1999. Reservoir LIFE extension program: Encouraging production of remaining oil and gas. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Engery (DoE),

Paks Nuclear Power Plant. Paks nuclear power plant: Service life extension. in Paks Nuclear Power Plant Ltd. [database online]. Hungary, 2010Available from http://paksnuclearpowerplant.com/service-life-extension (accessed August 5, 2010).

SEI. Software engineering institute. in Software Engineering Institute (SEI)/Carnegie-Mellon University (CMU) [database online]. Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 2010Available from http://www.sei.cmu.edu (accessed August 5, 2010).

List all references cited in the article. Note: SEBoK 0.5 uses Chicago Manual of Style (15th ed). See the BKCASE Reference Guidance for additional information.

Primary References

Blanchard and Fabrycky. 2006. Systems Engineering and Analysis, 4th edition. Prentice Hall International Series.

INCOSE. 2011. Systems Engineering Handbook: A Guide for System Life Cycle Processes and Activities. Version 3.2.1. San Diego, CA, USA: International Council on Systems Engineering (INCOSE), INCOSE-TP-2003-002-03.2.1

Jackson. 2007. A Multidisciplinary Framework for Resilience to Disasters and Disruptions. Journal of Integrated Design and Process Science Volume 11 (2), IOS Press

OUSD(AT&L). 2010. Logistics and Materiel Readiness. On-line policies, procedures, and planning references. Arlington, VA, USA: Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Aquisition, Transportation and Logistics (OUSD(AT&L)). Available at: http://www.acq.osd.mil/log

Seacord R.C., D. Plakosh, G.A. Lewis. 2003. Modernizing Legacy Systems. Boston, MA, USA: Addison Wesley, Pearson Education Inc.

Caltrans and USDOT. 2005. Systems Engineering Guidebook for Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS). Sacramento, CA, USA: California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) Division of Research and Innovation and U.S. Department of Defense (USDOT), SEG for ITS 1.1.


All primary references should be listed in alphabetical order. Remember to identify primary references by creating an internal link using the ‘’’reference title only’’’ (title). Please do not include version numbers in the links.

Additional References

AWWA. AWWA manuals of water supply practices. in American Water Works Association (AWWA) [database online]. Denver, CO, USA, 2010 Available from http://www.awwa.org/Resources/standards.cfm?ItemNumber=47829&navItemNumber=47834 (accessed August 5, 2010).

Blanchard, B. S. 2010. Logistics engineering and management. 5th ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA: Prentice Hall: p341-342.

Braunstein, A. 2007. Balancing hardware end-of-life costs and responsibilities. Westport, CT, USA: Experture Group, ETS 07-12-18.

Brown, M., R. Weyers, and M. Sprinkel. 2006. Service life extension of virginia bridge decks afforded by epoxy-coated reinforcement. Journal of ASTM International (JAI) 3 (2) (February 2005): 13.

Caltrans, and USDOT. 2005. Systems engineering guidebook for ITS, version 1.1. Sacramento, CA, USA: California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) Division of Research & Innovation/U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT), SEG for ITS 1.1 : p278, 101-103, 107.

Casetta, E. 2001. Transportation systems engineering: Theory and methods. New York, NY: Kluwer Publishers Academic, Springer.

DAU. Acquisition community connection (ACC): Where the DoD AT&L workforce meets to share knowledge. in Defense Acquisition University (DAU)/US Department of Defense (DoD) [database online]. Ft. Belvoir, VA, USA, 2010 Available from https://acc.dau.mil/ (accessed August 5, 2010).

DLA. Defense logistics agency disposition services [homepage]. in Defense Logistics Agency (DLA)/U.S. Department of Defense [database online]. Battle Creek, MI, USA, 2010 [cited June 19 2010]: p5. Available from http://www.dtc.dla.mil.

Elliot, T., K. Chen, and R. C. Swanekamp. 1998. Standard handbook of powerplant engineering. New York, NY: McGraw Hill, section 6.5.

FAA. 2006. Section 4.1. In Systems engineering manual. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA).

FCC. 2009. Radio and television broadcast rules. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC), 47 CFR Part 73, FCC Rule 09-19: p 11299-11318.

Finlayson, B., and B. Herdlick. 2008. Systems engineering of deployed systems. Baltimore, MD, USA: Johns Hopkins University: p28.

Gehring, G., D. Lindemuth, and W. T. Young. 2004. Break Reduction/Life extension program for CAST and ductile iron water mains. Paper presented at NO-DIG 2004, Conference of the North American Society for Trenchless Technology (NASTT), March 22-24, 2004, New Orleans, LA, USA.

Hovinga, M. N., and G. J. Nakoneczny. May 2000. Standard recommendations for pressure part inspection during a boiler life extension program. Paper presented at ICOLM (International Conference on Life Management and Life Extension of Power Plant), Xi’an, P.R. China.

IEC. 2007. Obsolescence management - application guide, ed 1.0. Geneva, Switzerland: International Electrotechnical Commission, IEC 62302.

IEEE. 2010 IEEE Standard Framework for Reliability Prediction of Hardware. New York, NY: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), IEEE STD 1413.

IEEE. 1998 IEEE Standard Reliability Program for the Development and Production of Electronic Systems and Equipment. New York, NY: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), IEEE STD 1332.

IEEE. 2008. IEEE Recommended practice on Software Reliability. New York, NY: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), IEEE STD 1633.


IEEE 2008. ISO/IEC/IEEE Systems and Software Engineering – System Life Cycle Processes. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization, ISO 15288.

IEEE 2005. IEEE Standard for Software Configuration Management Plans. New York, NY: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), IEEE STD 828.

Ihii, K., C. F. Eubanks, and P. Di Marco. 1994. Design for product retirement and material life-cycle. Materials & Design 15 (4): 225-33.

INCOSE. 2010. In-service systems working group. San Diego, CA, USA: International Council on Systems Engineering (INCOSE).

INCOSE UK Chapter. 2010. Applying systems engineering to in-service systems: Supplementary guidance to the INCOSE systems engineering handbook, version 3.2, issue 1.0. Foresgate, UK: International Council on Systems Engineering (INCOSE) UK Chapter, p10, 13, 23.

Institute of Engineers Singapore. 2009. Systems engineering body of knowledge, provisional version 2.0. Singapore.

ISO/IEC. 2003. Industrial automation systems integration-integration of life-cycle data for process plants including oil, gas production factilies. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization (ISO)/International Electro technical Commission (IEC), .

———. 1997. Systems engineering for commercial aircraft. Surrey, UK: Ashgate Publishing Ltd.

Koopman, P. Life cycle considerations. in Carnegie-Mellon University (CMU) [database online]. Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 1999Available from http://www.ece.cmu.edu/~koopman/des_s99/life_cycle/index.html (accessed August 5, 2010).

L3 Communications. 2010. Service life extension program (SLEP). Newport News, VA, USA: L3 Communications, Flight International Aviation LLC.

Livingston, H. 2010. GEB1: Diminishing manufacturing sources and material shortages (DMSMS) management practices. McClellan, CA, USA: Defense MicroElectronics Activity (DMEA)/U.S. Department of Defense (DoD).

Mays, L., ed. 2000. Water distribution systems handbook. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Book Company: Chapter 3.

MDIT. 2008. System maintenance guidebook (SMG), version 1.1: A companion to the systems engineering methdology (SEM) of the state unified information technology environment (SUITE). MI, USA: Michigan Department of Information Technology (MDIT), DOE G 200: p38.

NAS. 2006. Natioanl airspace system (NAS) system engineering manual, version 3.1 (volumes 1-3). Washington, DC: Air Traffic Organization (ATO)/U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), NAS SEM 3.1.

NASA. December 2007. Systems engineering handbook. Washington, D.C.: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), NASA/SP-2007-6105.

Office of Natural Gas and Oil Technology. 1999. Reservoir LIFE extension program: Encouraging production of remaining oil and gas. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Engery (DoE), .

Paks Nuclear Power Plant. Paks nuclear power plant: Service life extension. in Paks Nuclear Power Plant Ltd. [database online]. Hungary, 2010Available from http://paksnuclearpowerplant.com/service-life-extension (accessed August 5, 2010).

Reason, J. 1997. Managing the risks of organizational accident. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.

Ryen, E. 2008. Overview of hte systems engineering process. Bismarck, ND, USA: North Dakota Department of Transpofration (NDDOT).

SAE International. 2010. Standards: Automotive--maintenance and aftermarket. Warrendale, PA, USA: Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) International.

SEI. Software engineering institute. in Software Engineering Institute (SEI)/Carnegie-Mellon University (CMU) [database online]. Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 2010Available from http://www.sei.cmu.edu (accessed August 5, 2010).

Schafer, D.L. 2003. Keeping Pace With Technology Advances When Funding Resources Are Diminished. Paper presented at AUTOTESTCON 2003. IEEE Systems Readiness Technology Conference, Anaheim, CA :p 584.

SOLE. Applications divisons. in The International Society of Logistics (SOLE) [database online]. Hyattsville, MD, USA, 2009Available from http://www.sole.org/appdiv.asp (accessed August 5, 2010).

Sukamto, S. 2003. Plant aging and life extention program at arun LNG plant lhokseumawe, north aceh, indonesia. Paper presented at 22nd Annual World Gas Conference, 1-5 June, 2010, Tokyo, Japan.

All additional references should be listed in alphabetical order.


Article Discussion

[Go to discussion page]

<- Previous Article | Parent Article | Next Article ->

Signatures