Difference between revisions of "Talk:System Analysis"

From SEBoK
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Replaced content with "{{Review Instructions}}")
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Coherence with Part 2 ==
+
{{Review Instructions}}
Hillary S:
 
 
 
This section looks as if it is going in the right direction, though it could benefit with a slightly more coherent structure and a more holistic principled overview - the current writing style feels very process-centric rather than purpose-driven.
 
 
 
There is a section on "systems analysis" in Section 2, which at the moment is completely incoherent with this (part 3) article! Co-ordination is required.
 
 
 
Olwell: this is a fairly narrow view of systems analysis.  Broader views include capability analysis, mission analysis, development of CONOPS, analysis of T&E data, and modeling and simulation activities applied throughout the entire SE process.  There are very few citations in the body of the article; many more are needed for V1.0.
 

Latest revision as of 00:28, 7 November 2011

Review Instructions

Please note that in order to provide review comments, you must first log in to the wiki. Please go to Login or create an account if you do not have a username (less than 1 minute).


Please provide your feedback on this article by responding to the specific discussion points below. In order to respond, please click “Reply” under the appropriate discussion thread. Feel free to read the comments of other reviewers as well (you may also respond directly to these comments). Please note that each article has a place for “Open Discussion” – please place any comments not related to the specific discussion points into this thread.

As the BKCASE author team develops SEBoK 0.75, they will provide an adjudication comment for each ‘‘thread’’ in the discussion – not each individual comment.

Note: We value community feedback and assume that all reviewers will respond in a professional manner. However, if any reviewer uses any form of profanity or consistently posts inflammatory comments or spam messages, that reviewer’s IP address will be blocked. To report any such problems, please email bkcase@stevens.edu.