Difference between revisions of "Talk:System Analysis"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
There is a section on "systems analysis" in Section 2, which at the moment is completely incoherent with this (part 3) article! Co-ordination is required. | There is a section on "systems analysis" in Section 2, which at the moment is completely incoherent with this (part 3) article! Co-ordination is required. | ||
| − | Olwell: this is a fairly narrow view of systems analysis. Broader views include capability analysis, mission analysis, development of CONOPS, analysis of T&E data, and modeling and simulation activities applied throughout the entire SE process. | + | Olwell: this is a fairly narrow view of systems analysis. Broader views include capability analysis, mission analysis, development of CONOPS, analysis of T&E data, and modeling and simulation activities applied throughout the entire SE process. There are very few citations in the body of the article; many more are needed for V1.0. |
Revision as of 12:57, 6 September 2011
Coherence with Part 2
Hillary S:
This section looks as if it is going in the right direction, though it could benefit with a slightly more coherent structure and a more holistic principled overview - the current writing style feels very process-centric rather than purpose-driven.
There is a section on "systems analysis" in Section 2, which at the moment is completely incoherent with this (part 3) article! Co-ordination is required.
Olwell: this is a fairly narrow view of systems analysis. Broader views include capability analysis, mission analysis, development of CONOPS, analysis of T&E data, and modeling and simulation activities applied throughout the entire SE process. There are very few citations in the body of the article; many more are needed for V1.0.