Difference between revisions of "Architecture Framework (glossary)"
Tag: visualeditor |
Tag: visualeditor |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
===Discussion=== | ===Discussion=== | ||
| − | Examples of architecture frameworks: | + | Examples of architecture frameworks include: |
| − | DOD. 2010. ''DOD | + | DOD. 2010. ''DOD ''Architecture Framework.'' Version 2.02. Arlington, VA, USA: US'' |
| − | Architecture Framework.'' Version 2.02. Arlington, VA, USA: US | ||
Department of Defense. Available at: http://cio-nii.defense.gov/sites/dodaf20/ | Department of Defense. Available at: http://cio-nii.defense.gov/sites/dodaf20/ | ||
| − | MOD. 2010. ''MOD | + | MOD. 2010. ''MOD ''Architecture Framework.'' Version 1.2.004. UK Ministry of Defence.'' |
| − | Architecture Framework.'' Version 1.2.004. UK Ministry of Defence. | ||
Available at: http://www.mod.uk/DefenceInternet/AboutDefence/WhatWeDo/InformationManagement/MODAF/. | Available at: http://www.mod.uk/DefenceInternet/AboutDefence/WhatWeDo/InformationManagement/MODAF/. | ||
| − | The Open Group. | + | The Open Group. 2011. ''TOGAF'', version 9.1. Hogeweg, The Netherlands: Van Haren |
| − | 2011. ''TOGAF'', version 9.1. Hogeweg, The Netherlands: Van Haren | ||
Publishing. Accessed August 29, 2012. Available at: https://www2.opengroup.org/ogsys/jsp/publications/PublicationDetails.jsp?catalogno=g116. | Publishing. Accessed August 29, 2012. Available at: https://www2.opengroup.org/ogsys/jsp/publications/PublicationDetails.jsp?catalogno=g116. | ||
| − | Zachman, J. 2008. | + | Zachman, J. 2008. "John Zachman's Concise Definition of The Zachman Framework™." |
| − | "John Zachman's Concise Definition of The Zachman Framework™." | ||
Zachman International Enterprise Architecture. Accessed August 29, 2012. | Zachman International Enterprise Architecture. Accessed August 29, 2012. | ||
Available at: http://www.zachman.com/about-the-zachman-framework. | Available at: http://www.zachman.com/about-the-zachman-framework. | ||
| + | |||
| + | See the section 'Enterprise Architecture Frameworks & Methodologies' in [[Enterprise Systems Engineering Key Concepts]] | ||
Revision as of 07:04, 29 June 2015
An architecture framework establishes a common practice for creating, interpreting, analyzing and using architecture descriptions within a particular domain of application or stakeholder community. (ISO/IEC/IEEE 2007)
Source
ISO/IEC/IEEE. 2007. Recommended Practice for Architectural Description of Software-Intensive Systems. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organisation for Standardisation / International Electrotechnical Commissions. ISO/IEC/IEEE 1471:2007. Available at http://www.iso-architecture.org/ieee-1471/cm/.
Discussion
Examples of architecture frameworks include:
DOD. 2010. DOD Architecture Framework. Version 2.02. Arlington, VA, USA: US Department of Defense. Available at: http://cio-nii.defense.gov/sites/dodaf20/
MOD. 2010. MOD Architecture Framework. Version 1.2.004. UK Ministry of Defence. Available at: http://www.mod.uk/DefenceInternet/AboutDefence/WhatWeDo/InformationManagement/MODAF/.
The Open Group. 2011. TOGAF, version 9.1. Hogeweg, The Netherlands: Van Haren Publishing. Accessed August 29, 2012. Available at: https://www2.opengroup.org/ogsys/jsp/publications/PublicationDetails.jsp?catalogno=g116.
Zachman, J. 2008. "John Zachman's Concise Definition of The Zachman Framework™." Zachman International Enterprise Architecture. Accessed August 29, 2012. Available at: http://www.zachman.com/about-the-zachman-framework.
See the section 'Enterprise Architecture Frameworks & Methodologies' in Enterprise Systems Engineering Key Concepts
SEBoK Discussion
Please provide your comments and feedback on the SEBoK below. You will need to log in to DISQUS using an existing account (e.g. Yahoo, Google, Facebook, Twitter, etc.) or create a DISQUS account. Simply type your comment in the text field below and DISQUS will guide you through the login or registration steps. Feedback will be archived and used for future updates to the SEBoK. If you provided a comment that is no longer listed, that comment has been adjudicated. You can view adjudication for comments submitted prior to SEBoK v. 1.0 at SEBoK Review and Adjudication. Later comments are addressed and changes are summarized in the Letter from the Editor and Acknowledgements and Release History.
If you would like to provide edits on this article, recommend new content, or make comments on the SEBoK as a whole, please see the SEBoK Sandbox.
blog comments powered by Disqus