Difference between revisions of "ENG Competency Model"
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
There currently is no one accepted systems engineering competency model that is globally applicable and accepted widely within the discipline of systems engineering. To the contrary, the topic on [[Roles and Competencies]] has shown the best practice is for an organization to develop its own systems engineering competency model after evaluating its own needs with its stakeholders, organization, and workforce and within the context of its complete environment, e.g., economic, social, political. Nevertheless, the process of developing an organization's systems engineering competency model can be greatly informed and aided by evaluating the systems engineering competency models of other publicly available models. Consequently, the U.S. Department of Defense's systems engineering competency model is offered as an example of a national defense organization. | There currently is no one accepted systems engineering competency model that is globally applicable and accepted widely within the discipline of systems engineering. To the contrary, the topic on [[Roles and Competencies]] has shown the best practice is for an organization to develop its own systems engineering competency model after evaluating its own needs with its stakeholders, organization, and workforce and within the context of its complete environment, e.g., economic, social, political. Nevertheless, the process of developing an organization's systems engineering competency model can be greatly informed and aided by evaluating the systems engineering competency models of other publicly available models. Consequently, the U.S. Department of Defense's systems engineering competency model is offered as an example of a national defense organization. | ||
| − | + | The former DoD competency model SPRDE-SE/PSE Competency Assessment was replaced by the ENG competency model in 2013, when the Systems Planning, Research, Development, and Engineering (SPRDE) career field and the SE and Program Systems Engineer (PSE) career field were consolidate into one. [http://www.acq.osd.mil/se/docs/USD-ATLMemo-SPRDE-PSE-Sunsetting-16Sep2013.pdf|USD(AT&L) memo] Accessed 26 November 2014. | |
Revision as of 13:43, 26 November 2014
DAU. 2013. SPRDE Competency Model, 12 June 2013 version. in Defense Acquisition University (DAU)/U.S. Department of Defense. [1]
Usage
This source is considered a primary reference for the following articles:
Annotation
There currently is no one accepted systems engineering competency model that is globally applicable and accepted widely within the discipline of systems engineering. To the contrary, the topic on Roles and Competencies has shown the best practice is for an organization to develop its own systems engineering competency model after evaluating its own needs with its stakeholders, organization, and workforce and within the context of its complete environment, e.g., economic, social, political. Nevertheless, the process of developing an organization's systems engineering competency model can be greatly informed and aided by evaluating the systems engineering competency models of other publicly available models. Consequently, the U.S. Department of Defense's systems engineering competency model is offered as an example of a national defense organization.
The former DoD competency model SPRDE-SE/PSE Competency Assessment was replaced by the ENG competency model in 2013, when the Systems Planning, Research, Development, and Engineering (SPRDE) career field and the SE and Program Systems Engineer (PSE) career field were consolidate into one. memo Accessed 26 November 2014.
SEBoK Discussion
Please provide your comments and feedback on the SEBoK below. You will need to log in to DISQUS using an existing account (e.g. Yahoo, Google, Facebook, Twitter, etc.) or create a DISQUS account. Simply type your comment in the text field below and DISQUS will guide you through the login or registration steps. Feedback will be archived and used for future updates to the SEBoK. If you provided a comment that is no longer listed, that comment has been adjudicated. You can view adjudication for comments submitted prior to SEBoK v. 1.0 at SEBoK Review and Adjudication. Later comments are addressed and changes are summarized in the Letter from the Editor and Acknowledgements and Release History.
If you would like to provide edits on this article, recommend new content, or make comments on the SEBoK as a whole, please see the SEBoK Sandbox.
blog comments powered by Disqus