Difference between revisions of "Enabling Individuals"
m (→Topics) |
m (→Context) |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
==Context== | ==Context== | ||
===Individuals, Teams, Businesses, and Enterprises=== | ===Individuals, Teams, Businesses, and Enterprises=== | ||
| − | The ability to perform SE resides in individuals, teams, and businesses. | + | The ability to perform SE resides in individuals, teams, and businesses. An expert systems engineer possesses many competencies at a high level of proficiency, but no one can be highly proficient in all possible competencies. Collectively, a team and a business might possess all needed competencies at a high level of proficiency. A business performs the full range of SE roles, may have dedicated functions to perform specific SE roles, and may have a strategy for combining individual, team, and business abilities to execute SE on a complex activity. Individuals within the business may be responsible for performing one or more roles. |
| + | |||
| + | For descriptions of SE roles and competencies from the literature, see [[Roles and Competencies]]). | ||
===Competency, Capability, Capacity, and Performance=== | ===Competency, Capability, Capacity, and Performance=== | ||
| − | The discussion of SE competency, capability, capacity, and performance is complex. | + | The final execution and performance of SE is a function of competency, capability, and capacity. This knowledge area focuses on individual competency. |
| + | |||
| + | The discussion of SE competency, capability, capacity, and performance is complex. For example: | ||
| + | *There is disagreement in the literature about whether the term competency applies to the individual level only or can be correctly used at the team, project, and enterprise levels as well. | ||
| + | *Capability encompasses not just human capital, but processes, machines, tools, and equipment as well. Even if an individual has an outstanding level of competency, having to perform within a limited timeframe might degrade the results. Capacity accounts for this. | ||
===Systems Engineering Competency=== | ===Systems Engineering Competency=== | ||
| − | Competency is built from knowledge, skills, abilities, and attitudes ([[Acronyms|KSAA]]). | + | Competency is built from knowledge, skills, abilities, and attitudes ([[Acronyms|KSAA]]). What is inherent in an individual may be subsequently developed through education, training, and experience. Traditionally, SE competencies have been developed primarily through experience, but recently, education and training have taken on a much greater role. |
| + | |||
| + | SE competency must be viewed through its relationships to the systems life cycle, the SE discipline, and the domain in which the engineer practices SE. Competency models for SE typically include | ||
| + | *technical KSAAs; | ||
| + | *“soft” KSAAs such as leadership and communications; | ||
| + | *KSAAs that focus on the domains within which SE is to be practiced; | ||
| + | *a set of applicable competencies; and | ||
| + | *a scale for assessing the level of individual proficiency in each competency (often subjective, since proficiency is not easily measured). | ||
===Competency Models=== | ===Competency Models=== | ||
| − | + | SE competency models can be used to explicitly state and actively manage the SE competencies within in an organization. Contexts in which individual competency models are typically used include: | |
| − | + | *'''Recruitment and Selection:''' Competencies define categories for behavioral event interviewing (BEI), increasing the validity and reliability of selection and promotion decisions. | |
| − | + | *'''Human Resources Planning and Placements:''' Competencies are used to identify individuals to fill specific positions and/or identify gaps in key competency areas. | |
| + | *'''Education, Training, and Development:''' Explicit competency models let employees know which competencies are valued within their organization. Curriculum and interventions can be designed around desired competencies. | ||
| − | + | See [[Roles and Competencies]] for descriptions of publicly available SE competency models. | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
Revision as of 16:21, 10 September 2012
This knowledge area focuses on enabling an individual to perform SE, and addresses the roles of individuals in the SE profession, how individuals are developed for and assessed in these roles, and what ethical behavior is expected of them. Once an individual is enabled to perform SE using the techniques described here, the knowledge found in Part 3, Systems Engineering and Management, about how to perform SE can be applied.
Part 5, Enabling Systems Engineering, to which this knowledge area belongs, explores how systems engineering (SE) is enabled at three levels of organization: the business or enterprise, the team, and the individual. Ultimately, individuals perform SE tasks within a team or business.
To download a PDF of all of Part 5 (including this knowledge area), please click here.
For the sake of brevity, the term “business” is used to mean “business or enterprise” throughout most of this knowledge area. For a nuanced explanation of what distinguishes a business from a enterprise, see Enabling Systems Engineering.
Topics
Each part of the SEBoK is composed of knowledge areas (KAs). Each KA groups topics together around a theme related to the overall subject of the part. This KA contains four topics:
- Roles and Competencies discusses allocation of SE roles, which sets of competencies correspond to particular roles, and what competency models are current in the SE world.
- Assessing Individuals discusses how to determine the level of individual proficiency and quality of performance.
- Developing Individuals explains how SE competency is acquired.
- Ethical Behavior describes the ethical standards that apply to individuals and organizations.
Context
Individuals, Teams, Businesses, and Enterprises
The ability to perform SE resides in individuals, teams, and businesses. An expert systems engineer possesses many competencies at a high level of proficiency, but no one can be highly proficient in all possible competencies. Collectively, a team and a business might possess all needed competencies at a high level of proficiency. A business performs the full range of SE roles, may have dedicated functions to perform specific SE roles, and may have a strategy for combining individual, team, and business abilities to execute SE on a complex activity. Individuals within the business may be responsible for performing one or more roles.
For descriptions of SE roles and competencies from the literature, see Roles and Competencies).
Competency, Capability, Capacity, and Performance
The final execution and performance of SE is a function of competency, capability, and capacity. This knowledge area focuses on individual competency.
The discussion of SE competency, capability, capacity, and performance is complex. For example:
- There is disagreement in the literature about whether the term competency applies to the individual level only or can be correctly used at the team, project, and enterprise levels as well.
- Capability encompasses not just human capital, but processes, machines, tools, and equipment as well. Even if an individual has an outstanding level of competency, having to perform within a limited timeframe might degrade the results. Capacity accounts for this.
Systems Engineering Competency
Competency is built from knowledge, skills, abilities, and attitudes (KSAA). What is inherent in an individual may be subsequently developed through education, training, and experience. Traditionally, SE competencies have been developed primarily through experience, but recently, education and training have taken on a much greater role.
SE competency must be viewed through its relationships to the systems life cycle, the SE discipline, and the domain in which the engineer practices SE. Competency models for SE typically include
- technical KSAAs;
- “soft” KSAAs such as leadership and communications;
- KSAAs that focus on the domains within which SE is to be practiced;
- a set of applicable competencies; and
- a scale for assessing the level of individual proficiency in each competency (often subjective, since proficiency is not easily measured).
Competency Models
SE competency models can be used to explicitly state and actively manage the SE competencies within in an organization. Contexts in which individual competency models are typically used include:
- Recruitment and Selection: Competencies define categories for behavioral event interviewing (BEI), increasing the validity and reliability of selection and promotion decisions.
- Human Resources Planning and Placements: Competencies are used to identify individuals to fill specific positions and/or identify gaps in key competency areas.
- Education, Training, and Development: Explicit competency models let employees know which competencies are valued within their organization. Curriculum and interventions can be designed around desired competencies.
See Roles and Competencies for descriptions of publicly available SE competency models.
References
None.
SEBoK Discussion
Please provide your comments and feedback on the SEBoK below. You will need to log in to DISQUS using an existing account (e.g. Yahoo, Google, Facebook, Twitter, etc.) or create a DISQUS account. Simply type your comment in the text field below and DISQUS will guide you through the login or registration steps. Feedback will be archived and used for future updates to the SEBoK. If you provided a comment that is no longer listed, that comment has been adjudicated. You can view adjudication for comments submitted prior to SEBoK v. 1.0 at SEBoK Review and Adjudication. Later comments are addressed and changes are summarized in the Letter from the Editor and Acknowledgements and Release History.
If you would like to provide edits on this article, recommend new content, or make comments on the SEBoK as a whole, please see the SEBoK Sandbox.
blog comments powered by Disqus