Difference between revisions of "Systems Approach Applied to Engineered Systems"

From SEBoK
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 17: Line 17:
 
*[[Applying the Systems Approach]]
 
*[[Applying the Systems Approach]]
  
==What is a Systems Approach?==  
+
==Systems Approach==
The term [[Systems Approach (glossary)]] defined by authors such as Churchman (Churchman 1979) is an aspect of [[What is Systems Thinking?|Systems Thinking]] through which we consider a System from the view point of those outside its boundary.  In particular,  we can gain significant insight by understanding the "enemies" of viewing the system holistically.  While this is an important foundation for the system thinking which underpins the Systems Approach, this Knowledge Area uses the term to describe both systemic understanding and action as discussed below.
+
As discussed in [[Systems Approaches]] the term Systems Approach is used by a number of Systems Science authors to describe the application of systems thinking to problems and in particular the idea of considering issues outside of the boundary of the immediate system of interest, (Churchman 1979).
 
The [[Systems Approach (glossary)]] is defined as a set of principles for applying [[Systems Thinking (glossary)]] to [[Engineered System (glossary)]] contexts. According to Jackson et al (2010, pp. 41-43), the Systems Approach is a problem solving paradigm. It is a comprehensive problem understanding and resolution approach based upon the principles of systems thinking; and utilizing the concepts and thinking tools of [[Systems Science (glossary)]] along with the concepts inherent in engineering problem solving. It incorporates a [[Holistic (glossary)]] systems view of the system that includes the larger context of the system, including engineering and operational environments, stakeholders, and full life cycle. This Systems Approach forms the foundation for the descriptions and standards which define the practices of Systems Engineering. Systems engineering-related competency models generally agree that a fully capable systems engineer must employ Systems Thinking when undertaking these practices.  
 
  
According to Checkland (1999, 318), Systems Thinking is “''an epistemology which, when applied to human activity is based on basic ideas of systems''.
+
According to Jackson et al (2010, pp. 41-43), the Systems Approach is a problem solving paradigm. It is a comprehensive problem understanding and resolution approach based upon the principles of systems thinking; and utilizing the concepts and thinking tools of Systems Science along with the concepts inherent in engineering problem solving. It incorporates a Holistic systems view of the system that includes the larger context of the system, including engineering and operational environments, stakeholders, and full life cycle.  
  
Senge (1990) provides an expanded definition as follows: “''Systems thinking is a discipline for seeing wholes. It is a framework for seeing interrelationships rather than things, for seeing patterns of change rather than static "snapshots." It is a set of general principles -- distilled over the course of the twentieth century, spanning fields as diverse as the physical and social sciences, engineering, and management. During the last thirty years, these tools have been applied to understand a wide range of corporate, urban, regional, economic, political, ecological, and even psychological systems. And systems thinking is a sensibility for the subtle interconnectedness that gives living systems their unique character''.
+
The Systems Approach is defined as a set of principles for applying Systems Thinking to Engineered System contexts and forms the foundation for the descriptions and standards which define the practices of Systems Engineering. Systems engineering-related competency models generally agree that a fully capable systems engineer must employ Systems Thinking when undertaking these practices.  
  
These sources and others discussed in the [[Systems Thinking]] knowledge area associate at least three different ideas to Systems Thinking. The first is a set of concepts to assist in learning how to think in terms of systems; the second is a set of principles to ensure a holistic approach to problems whatever there domain and the third is a set of tools to support the approach.  The Systems Approach utilises all three of these aspects of Systems Thinking.
+
==Purpose and benefits of a systems approach for Engineered Systems==
  
In the Introduction to [[Systems|SEBoK Part 2]] we make the following distinctions:
+
There is a wide stakeholder desire to achieve the benefits that Systems Engineering claims to deliver, in contexts where current SE approaches are inadequate or irrelevant – hence the need for a better articulation of “the Systems Approach” and how to apply it to non-traditional problems.  
*[[Systems Thinking (glossary)]] is a fundamental set of ideas which encapsulate a way of thinking about something as a set of related systems.
 
*[[Systems Science (glossary)]]  is an interdisciplinary field of science that studies the nature of complex systems in nature, society, and science. It aims to develop interdisciplinary foundations, which are applicable in a variety of areas, such as engineering, biology, medicine and social sciences. The outputs of this work can be summarized by:
 
**A System of [[Systems Concept (glossary)]], defining ideas which can be used to better understand the systemic nature of a situation or thing, independent of its application domain
 
**A number of [[Systems Philosophy, Theories, and Mathematics|Systems Methodologies]] , which organize these ideas into a problem exploration and/or solution creation approach.  These methodologies are often based upon a particular world view or paradigm, which influences the approach they take and the models they use.
 
*[[Systems Approach (glossary)]] is a combination of the above into a generic problem resolution approach which spans the whole life of an [[Engineered System (glossary)]] context, as part of the exploration and resolution of one or more real world problem situations or opportunities.
 
  
Note, the definitions above have been produced for the SEBoK to provide a framework of ideas to help understand the relationships between systems ideas and the practice of Systems Engineering.  While they are not inconsistent with the literature in outline some authors have used different combinations of terminology to express them.  It is our aim for the above ideas to help SEBoK readers to understand the literature and its relevance to them, without becoming too confused by slight differences, or even contradictions, in the detailed language used.
+
The purpose of taking a systems approach is, by considering “whole system, whole lifecycle, whole stakeholder community”, to ensure that the purpose of the system (or systemic intervention) is achieved sustainably without causing negative unintended consequences, and to avoid “transferring the burden” to some other part of the environment unable to sustain the burden.
  
 +
Many authors (e.g. (Blockley and Godfrey, 2000); (Hitchins, 2007), (Jackson, 2010), current work in various defence organisations on “comprehensive approach” and “capability engineering”) demonstrate and/or assert that a systems approach must be purpose driven if it is to deliver the intended benefits.
 +
 +
A good example of the success of such a purpose-driven approach is the British air defence system set up in the 1930s (Hitchins, 2007, pp 231-244). The particular demonstration of a “whole systems” approach that is often cited is the relative crudeness of the British radars, far less sophisticated than their contemporary German equivalents, but much more effective operationally, because what was optimised was not the radars per se as a technical product, but their integration into an overall network designed from the top as an information-centric battle management system.
 +
In the Introduction to SEBoK Part 2 we make the following distinctions:
 +
*Systems Thinking (glossary) is a fundamental set of ideas which encapsulate a way of thinking about something as a set of related systems.
 +
*Systems Science (glossary) is an interdisciplinary field of science that studies the nature of complex systems in nature, society, and science. It aims to develop interdisciplinary foundations, which are applicable in a variety of areas, such as engineering, biology, medicine and social sciences.
 +
*Systems Approach (glossary) is a combination of the above into a generic problem resolution approach, as part of the exploration and resolution of one or more real world problem situations or opportunities.
 +
 +
In an engineered system context, a “systems approach” is a holistic approach which spans the whole life of an Engineered System (glossary) in its operational context.
 
This Knowledge Area describes the Systems Approach in the context of applying Systems Thinking to an engineered system through its whole life.
 
This Knowledge Area describes the Systems Approach in the context of applying Systems Thinking to an engineered system through its whole life.
  

Revision as of 15:42, 29 July 2012

This Knowledge Area (KA) provides a guide to an approach to complex problems and opportunities based on systems science and the application of systems thinking . This knowledge is not specific to Systems Engineering, but is part of a wider systems body of knowledge. We have not attempted to capture all of the system knowledge here, but to identify those aspects relevant to the systems engineering body of knowledge.

The framework of activities and principles described in the KA are mapped to the other sections of the SEBoK to provide a guide to the system foundations of systems engineering practices.

To download a PDF of all of Part 2 (including this knowledge area), please click here.

Topics

The topics contained within this knowledge area include:

Systems Approach

As discussed in Systems Approaches the term Systems Approach is used by a number of Systems Science authors to describe the application of systems thinking to problems and in particular the idea of considering issues outside of the boundary of the immediate system of interest, (Churchman 1979).

According to Jackson et al (2010, pp. 41-43), the Systems Approach is a problem solving paradigm. It is a comprehensive problem understanding and resolution approach based upon the principles of systems thinking; and utilizing the concepts and thinking tools of Systems Science along with the concepts inherent in engineering problem solving. It incorporates a Holistic systems view of the system that includes the larger context of the system, including engineering and operational environments, stakeholders, and full life cycle.

The Systems Approach is defined as a set of principles for applying Systems Thinking to Engineered System contexts and forms the foundation for the descriptions and standards which define the practices of Systems Engineering. Systems engineering-related competency models generally agree that a fully capable systems engineer must employ Systems Thinking when undertaking these practices.

Purpose and benefits of a systems approach for Engineered Systems

There is a wide stakeholder desire to achieve the benefits that Systems Engineering claims to deliver, in contexts where current SE approaches are inadequate or irrelevant – hence the need for a better articulation of “the Systems Approach” and how to apply it to non-traditional problems.

The purpose of taking a systems approach is, by considering “whole system, whole lifecycle, whole stakeholder community”, to ensure that the purpose of the system (or systemic intervention) is achieved sustainably without causing negative unintended consequences, and to avoid “transferring the burden” to some other part of the environment unable to sustain the burden.

Many authors (e.g. (Blockley and Godfrey, 2000); (Hitchins, 2007), (Jackson, 2010), current work in various defence organisations on “comprehensive approach” and “capability engineering”) demonstrate and/or assert that a systems approach must be purpose driven if it is to deliver the intended benefits.

A good example of the success of such a purpose-driven approach is the British air defence system set up in the 1930s (Hitchins, 2007, pp 231-244). The particular demonstration of a “whole systems” approach that is often cited is the relative crudeness of the British radars, far less sophisticated than their contemporary German equivalents, but much more effective operationally, because what was optimised was not the radars per se as a technical product, but their integration into an overall network designed from the top as an information-centric battle management system. In the Introduction to SEBoK Part 2 we make the following distinctions:

  • Systems Thinking (glossary) is a fundamental set of ideas which encapsulate a way of thinking about something as a set of related systems.
  • Systems Science (glossary) is an interdisciplinary field of science that studies the nature of complex systems in nature, society, and science. It aims to develop interdisciplinary foundations, which are applicable in a variety of areas, such as engineering, biology, medicine and social sciences.
  • Systems Approach (glossary) is a combination of the above into a generic problem resolution approach, as part of the exploration and resolution of one or more real world problem situations or opportunities.

In an engineered system context, a “systems approach” is a holistic approach which spans the whole life of an Engineered System (glossary) in its operational context. This Knowledge Area describes the Systems Approach in the context of applying Systems Thinking to an engineered system through its whole life.

References

Works Cited

Checkland, P. 1999. Systems Thinking, Systems Practice. New York, NY, USA: John Wiley & Sons.

Churchman, C. West. 1979. The Systems Approach and Its Enemies. New York: Basic Books.

Hitchins, D. 2009. "What are the General Principles Applicable to Systems?". INCOSE Insight. 12(4).

Jackson, S., D. Hitchins, and H. Eisner. 2010. "What is the Systems Approach?". INCOSE Insight. 13(1): 41-43.

Senge, P. M. 1990. The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. New York, Doubleday/Currency.

Primary References

Checkland, P. 1999. Systems Thinking, Systems Practice. New York, NY, USA: John Wiley & Sons.

Hitchins, D. 2009. "What are the General Principles Applicable to Systems?". INCOSE Insight. 12(4).

Jackson, S., D. Hitchins, and H. Eisner. 2010. "What is the Systems Approach?". INCOSE Insight. 13(1): 41-43.

Lawson, H. 2010. A Journey Through the Systems Landscape. London, UK: College Publications, Kings College.

Senge, P. M. 1990. The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. New York, Doubleday/Currency.

Additional References

No additional reference have been identified for SEBoK 0.75. Please provide any recommendations on additional reference in your review.


< Previous Article | Parent Article | Next Article >
SEBoK v. 1.9.1 released 30 September 2018

SEBoK Discussion

Please provide your comments and feedback on the SEBoK below. You will need to log in to DISQUS using an existing account (e.g. Yahoo, Google, Facebook, Twitter, etc.) or create a DISQUS account. Simply type your comment in the text field below and DISQUS will guide you through the login or registration steps. Feedback will be archived and used for future updates to the SEBoK. If you provided a comment that is no longer listed, that comment has been adjudicated. You can view adjudication for comments submitted prior to SEBoK v. 1.0 at SEBoK Review and Adjudication. Later comments are addressed and changes are summarized in the Letter from the Editor and Acknowledgements and Release History.

If you would like to provide edits on this article, recommend new content, or make comments on the SEBoK as a whole, please see the SEBoK Sandbox.

blog comments powered by Disqus